1 Comment

I can see this being heavy handed. What about the landlords rights? The ones whom monthly rental income is their sole means for providing for their families. Not all landlords are wealthy rental investors.

How about the hardships that they will incur? and these are the very people providing housing for families and others.

Is it okay if they become homeless as well since part of what's being proposed is no evictions for nearly nine months? How are landlords going to be able to afford their mortgage and support their families especially if their sole income is rental income. Their are lots of small rental investors out their.

Where is the empathy for them?

Just seems way to bias. Unless the ultimate goal is to provide people with free housing on the landlords dime? So landlords would opt to discontinue on purchasing homes as rental properties and having to sell their current properties since they can not evict a tenant for 9 months. How will they be able to pay their mortgages. It seems the goal is to help families stay in homes at the expense of others? I'm a native tacoman and just want to understand where is the fairness for such landlords that provide us a place to stay?

Expand full comment